Ed Miliband, Tony Blair and the climate 'credibility gap'
Comments by former PM Tony Blair have opened up Labour to attacks over its energy policies
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
"Once again, Tony Blair has demonstrated his impeccable political timing," said The Telegraph.
Just days before tricky local elections for the Labour government, Blair, writing in a report by the Tony Blair Institute, said his former party needed to take a different approach to reaching net zero targets. Voters, he said, are likely to recognise the expanding "credibility gap" between being "asked to make financial sacrifices and changes in lifestyle" knowing that their "impact on global emissions is minimal".
The Tony Blair Institute eventually issued a statement clarifying that the former PM’s position is that the government’s direction on climate is the "right one". Furious government insiders, however, told The Guardian that Blair had undermined Keir Starmer on a key issue, at a crucial moment. One said: "Tony fucked up." Another said: "He has completely lost his touch."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Speculation over the timing of the comments has gone into overdrive in Westminster. Was this "just another scrap in [Blair's] polite but long-running tussle with Ed Miliband over the future of Labour?", asked The Telegraph. After all, the relationship between Blair and Miliband "is a very British acrimony, a tale not of all-out war but of passive-aggressive disagreement stretching back two decades".
Miliband's 'self-destructive goal'
The comments only heighten pressure on the government and Miliband over their net zero plans. "Rumours persist" that the energy secretary could even be "shunted out of his role" in the next cabinet shuffle, said Christian May at City A.M. Starmer could use the "perfect excuse", that the "world has changed", to depose Miliband, who is "doubling down" on the "arbitrary and self-destructive goal" of net zero.
Critics are arguing that "the pace of change" is the problem, not the "long-term necessity", said The Telegraph in an editorial. But Miliband has been "unprepared to countenance any suggestion" that it may be "reckless" to push forward with his current targets.
Former Labour leader Miliband has become an easy "target" for right-wing critics, and is often "undermined by his own side", said Andy Beckett in The Guardian. He has spent much of his 10 months as energy secretary "trying to justify the government’s climate compromises" and critics on each side are asking "when he will resign – or why he hasn’t already".
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
But while he is "hardly a perfect politician", the ire directed at him is really a "displacement activity", as it is "much easier to think about the end of Miliband than the end of the world".
Blair's 'tantrum'
The "anger in the Labour ranks was palpable" following Blair's comments, said Politico, particularly coming ahead of local elections in England. One insider said it was "the tantrum of 'someone struggling for influence'" and had given all sides "fodder to attack Labour".
In "a sign of the acrimony swilling around this debate within Labour", said the BBC's chief political correspondent Henry Zeffman, one government source told him that Blair's comments "may have been affected by the Tony Blair Institute having received funding from oil rich Saudi Arabia".
The government, for now, is standing by its net zero plans, viewing it as not just a "moral issue" but an "economic" one as well, said Rob Stait on LBC. But Blair’s critique "speaks to this new phase of the net zero culture wars; one in which net zero is becoming as politically totemic as Brexit", said The New Statesman's Megan Kenyon.
Richard Windsor is a freelance writer for The Week Digital. He began his journalism career writing about politics and sport while studying at the University of Southampton. He then worked across various football publications before specialising in cycling for almost nine years, covering major races including the Tour de France and interviewing some of the sport’s top riders. He led Cycling Weekly’s digital platforms as editor for seven of those years, helping to transform the publication into the UK’s largest cycling website. He now works as a freelance writer, editor and consultant.
-
How the FCC’s ‘equal time’ rule worksIn the Spotlight The law is at the heart of the Colbert-CBS conflict
-
What is the endgame in the DHS shutdown?Today’s Big Question Democrats want to rein in ICE’s immigration crackdown
-
‘Poor time management isn’t just an inconvenience’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump’s EPA kills legal basis for federal climate policySpeed Read The government’s authority to regulate several planet-warming pollutants has been repealed
-
The Mandelson files: Labour Svengali’s parting gift to StarmerThe Explainer Texts and emails about Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador could fuel biggest political scandal ‘for a generation’
-
Will Peter Mandelson and Andrew testify to US Congress?Today's Big Question Could political pressure overcome legal obstacles and force either man to give evidence over their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein?
-
Reforming the House of LordsThe Explainer Keir Starmer’s government regards reform of the House of Lords as ‘long overdue and essential’
-
How long can Keir Starmer last as Labour leader?Today's Big Question Pathway to a coup ‘still unclear’ even as potential challengers begin manoeuvring into position
-
What is at stake for Starmer in China?Today’s Big Question The British PM will have to ‘play it tough’ to achieve ‘substantive’ outcomes, while China looks to draw Britain away from US influence
-
The Board of Peace: Donald Trump’s ‘alternative to the UN’The Explainer Body set up to oversee reconstruction of Gaza could have broader mandate to mediate other conflicts and create a ‘US-dominated alternative to the UN’
-
Can Starmer continue to walk the Trump tightrope?Today's Big Question PM condemns US tariff threat but is less confrontational than some European allies