Shakespeare not an absent spouse, study proposes

A letter fragment suggests that the Shakespeares lived together all along, says scholar Matthew Steggle

Artist's rendition of William Shakespeare leaving his family to go to London
Artist's rendition of William Shakespeare leaving his family to go to London
(Image credit: Culture Club / Getty Images)

What happened

William Shakespeare was not an absentee husband living in an unhappy marriage to Anne Hathaway, as the couple has been portrayed for the past 200 years, a British scholar argues in a study published Wednesday in the journal Shakespeare. Instead, Matthew Steggle of the University of Bristol said, a letter fragment discovered in 1978 suggests the Shakespeares lived together in London during a fruitful decade in which the Bard wrote some of his most famous plays, including "Hamlet" and "Othello."

Who said what

Steggle's analysis "reads like a detective yarn set in the Elizabethan era," The Washington Post said. Over eight years, he followed the clues scattered through the letter to "Good Mrs. Shakspaire" of "Trinitie Lane." Steggle found that the subject of the letter, an orphan named John Butts, lived in London at the time, and there was a Trinity Lane in London — right across the Thames from Shakespeare's Globe Theater — but not in Stratford-upon-Avon, where Hathaway was traditionally believed to be "stashed" in a cottage while her husband was "living large as a lodger in swinging 1600s London," the Post said.

"For Shakespeare biographers who favor the narrative of the 'disastrous marriage' — in fact, for all Shakespeare biographers," Steggle said, the letter "should be a horrible, difficult problem."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

What next?

Steggle provides "plenty of plausible evidence" but "no smoking gun," James Shapiro, a Shakespeare scholar at Columbia University, told the Post. It will likely "take some time for the smoke to clear and a new scholarly consensus" to emerge, but "if Steggle is correct," this "will overturn many accepted beliefs."

Explore More
Peter Weber, The Week US

Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.