How Theresa May won the confidence vote but lost the country
There are no real winners in this Brexit conundrum
So British Prime Minister Theresa May survives to fight another day. The no-confidence vote by her own Conservative Party, called at the instigation of backbench Brexiteers, failed: She received the votes of 200 out of 317 Tory members of Parliament, enough to eke it out as the head of government.
The vote is being touted as a victory by May's ministers — she prevailed, after all, winning one vote more than she did when she contested for the leadership in 2016 in the wake of the Brexit referendum. But it is hard to give much credit to that spin. Members of May's government are obliged to support her or resign, after all.
But more importantly, the reason her leadership was being contested at all was down to her decision not to bring her negotiated Brexit deal to a vote in Parliament this week, a move she made because she knew she didn't have the votes for it to pass. It seems many members in Parliament — even those who aren't entirely against the Brexit deal she's negotiated with the EU — do not believe she's capable of getting that deal, or any deal, across the finish line.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But while it's hard to call the vote a victory for May, it's not clear that it's a victory for anybody else, either.
Consider the Conservative members of Parliament who led the campaign against her: From their perspective, the deal she negotiated with the EU is a parody of their ideal Brexit, giving Britain far too little of its sovereignty back. And they have a point: The most disputed provision is the "backstop," which would ensure there would never be a hard border between Ireland (which is part of the EU) and Northern Ireland (which remains part of the U.K.). The backstop would mean that all of Britain would remain subject to EU regulations — and therefore be unable to make new trade agreements on a bilateral basis — until an arrangement is worked out that permits an open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland after Britain exits the common market. As Brexiteers see it, remaining subject to those regulations without having any say in their drafting is not a restoration of sovereignty but its further surrender.
The sticking point, though, is that the Brexiteers have no alternative proposal, because none is logically possible. If Britain leaves the EU without any deal, there will be a hard border in Ireland. If Northern Ireland alone among the component countries of the U.K. continues to abide by EU rules, while the rest of Great Britain departs, then Britain will have formally separated Northern Ireland from the rest of the union, which is totally unacceptable to the Democratic Unionist Party upon which May's minority Tory government depends.
This circle can't be squared.
Of course, the most staunch Brexit proponents might not want to square it at all. Their view might be that no deal — a so-called "hard Brexit" — and the ensuing chaos, would be better than a bad deal. The chaos would be short-lived, after all, and the longer-term consequences — the shrinking of the financial sector, for example — were, while very painful, arguably part of the point. Even upsetting the applecart in Northern Ireland might be worth it.
But there is manifestly no parliamentary majority for a hard Brexit. Even Euroskeptic Labourites don't want that.
If, in fact, the House of Commons rejects the Brexit compromise negotiated by the government, May will surely have to resign. But before she does, she'd just as surely ask Parliament to vote for Brexit to be postponed indefinitely — as the European Court of Justice recently ruled member countries have the right to do — so that new negotiations to leave could be undertaken by the new government. And there would be little reason for Labour MPs not to support such a vote — it would mean voting for the Conservative Party's effective self-destruction.
The only way in which the Brexiteers can be said to have come out ahead is if their goal isn't to achieve a policy victory at all. Whether May somehow manages to pass her compromise Brexit deal with Labour votes (which is highly unlikely), or manages to get agreement on the so-called "Norway option" of remaining entirely within the Common Market but with no voting say in its rules, or has to admit defeat and postpone Brexit for a subsequent government to negotiate, the Brexiteer's fingerprints won't be anywhere on the result. That means they'll be able to tell everyone who is unhappy with said result that they were against it all along, and then tout the "better" plan they purportedly had up their sleeves the whole time. And they won't even have to topple May before the next election, as she has already promised not to stand as leader in the next election, regardless of how her Brexit compromise fares.
That may sound appallingly cynical. But it may not be foolish. After all, the union that Britain is agonizing over leaving has been looking pretty shaky itself these days. Euroskeptic parties are on the rise across the continent, and sit in power in Italy, while one of Europe's strongest champions, President Emmanuel Macron of France, has crumpled in the face of wide-spread protest. If the Brexiteers are lucky, by the time Britain's next prime minister gets around to negotiating the new terms of Britain's relationship with the EU, the EU might itself have exited.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Noah Millman is a screenwriter and filmmaker, a political columnist and a critic. From 2012 through 2017 he was a senior editor and featured blogger at The American Conservative. His work has also appeared in The New York Times Book Review, Politico, USA Today, The New Republic, The Weekly Standard, Foreign Policy, Modern Age, First Things, and the Jewish Review of Books, among other publications. Noah lives in Brooklyn with his wife and son.
-
Baltimore bridge disaster: Who is going to pay and how?
Today's Big Question Politicians, legal experts, and the insurance industry are all grappling with the financial fallout of America's worst infrastructure tragedy in years
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Melting polar ice is messing with global timekeeping
Speed Read Ice loss caused by climate change is slowing the Earth's rotation
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The Week contest: Stick guitar
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published