Why African independence was such a disaster
Colonialism was worse than people think
When you make a purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission
When Americans pay attention to Africa at all, it's generally because something terrible is happening. Sometimes it's epidemic disease, other times it's famine, or war, or a refugee crisis.
Yet there was a time not too long ago when Africa was viewed with considerable optimism. After World War II, colonial empires quickly became politically untenable, and European powers were forced to grant their African colonies independence, with varying amounts of haste. Relatively well-prepared nations like Ghana were celebrated across the world as auguring a new era of African independence and prosperity, finally free from Western interference.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Yet for the most part, it was not to be. Political and economic collapse were almost universal, across the continent. Leaders hailed as liberators, like Kwame Nkrumah, curdled into corrupt dictators. What went wrong? Some answers can be found in The State of Africa, a recently revised postcolonial history of the continent, by Martin Meredith.
When considering such a question, it is of course not to imply that Africa is all one country. It's a gigantic, diverse continent, with hundreds of languages, ethnic groups, and cultures. What newly independent African states did share, however, was proximity to each other, a similar recent history, and often similar political conditions. Moreover, the extraordinary resemblance between so many different countries' problems is itself strong evidence of similar underlying problems. As Meredith writes: "Indeed, what is so striking about the 50-year period since independence is the extent to which African states have suffered so many of the same misfortunes."
Colonialism's authoritarian, Western-centric legacy
European powers did set up governing structures in most of their colonies (some better than others), but these structures were thoroughly dictatorial. The whole point of a colony is to exert control over another place without the natives' consent, so this was basically unavoidable. This made it extremely easy and tempting for leaders of independent states to resort to repression when political dissent cropped up.
What little economic development colonial regimes did manage was also distorted. They tended to connect colonies to the European center, and not to each other — at independence one could make a direct call to Paris from francophone Africa, but it was impossible to find a train that would travel from Ghana to the Ivory Coast.
Tribal division and hatred
European powers carved up Africa with very little regard to the identity of the peoples living there — even using lines of latitude, longitude, or simple geometric shapes in many places, due to the lack of quality maps of the interior. As a result, many ethnic groups were divided between colonies, or crammed in together with many others.
This presented a problem during independence, for there was none of the mutual trust that underpins the modern state. The arbitrariness of state borders also presented a potential source of discrimination and violent conflict. New African polities, composed of dozens of ethnic groups, had little time to develop a substantive political discourse, so often resorted to tribal politics. With the authoritarian tendency already established, it was a quick road for one group to enrich itself at the expense of all the others.
A toxic political legacy
It turns out that Africans, like people everywhere, tend to despise brutal foreign domination. Thus, it's not surprising that African leaders who threw off the colonial yoke were hugely admired, and tended to win gigantic electoral majorities. But this enabled the authoritarian tendency, and greatly hindered the development of competitive, substantive politics. Many early African leaders, like Nkrumah and Touré, became virtual dictators.
Simple bad luck
New African states achieved independence in the 1950s and '60s, right at the peak of the Soviet Union's international credibility — when it seemed like it might really surpass the United States in economic prosperity and output. This, coupled to the well-deserved suspicion of Western economic models, led to a lot of extremely ill-advised attempts at USSR-style planning and socialism. With the exception of education, these mostly failed utterly. Africa's biggest comparative advantage — in farming and raw materials — also proved troublesome, as commodity prices plummeted in the early '70s, right when African states were running into serious difficulties.
Sheer proximity was also a major problem, as instability in one state tended to spill into neighboring ones.
Continued Western meddling
As economic problems mounted for African states, they often turned to the International Monetary Fund and World Bank for help. These tended to prescribe neoliberalism — privatizing state-owned enterprises, devaluing the currency, reducing budget deficits, and so forth — as a condition for help. The policies were sometimes appropriate, sometimes not, but the real problem was that they overlooked the major underlying problem — bad political institutions — and again imposed foreign domination.
However, there were exceptions, most notably Botswana. That is the only country in all of Africa to maintain free and fair elections since it achieved independence in 1966. For 20 years it had the highest growth rate in the world. Perhaps the biggest weakness of Meredith's book is that it doesn't contain much discussion of Botswana, and why it managed to escape all the pitfalls.
Nevertheless, Meredith's book is a solid historical overview. Judging by the title alone, the continent's prospects seem to have improved in the last decade — when it was first published in 2005, the book was called Fate of Africa: From Hopes of Freedom to the Heart of Despair. In the updated version, the subtitle is merely A History of the Continent Since Independence.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
'Voters know Biden and Trump all too well'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Is the Gaza war tearing U.S. campuses apart?
Today's Big Question Protests at Columbia University, other institutions, pit free speech against student safety
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
DOJ settles with Nassar victims for $138M
Speed Read The settlement includes 139 sexual abuse victims of the former USA Gymnastics doctor
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published