Diebold sells voting-machine business
Bruce Beattie, copyright 2009 Creators Syndicate
- Cartoons
- Video
- The Week Distills The
Best Of U.S. And Foreign
Press Into 44 Pages - This Week's Issue
- Get 4 Issues Free
- Subscribe Now
- Give a Gift Subscription
- Magazine Customer Service
Most Emailed
- The last word: Why old dogs are the best dogs
- Texas accidentally 'bans' straight-marriage
- Video: A dog greets returning soldier
- The right to have loud sex
- The last word: This is your brain on GPS
- The last word: He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- 2012: President Sarah Palin?
- Is Sarah Palin a 'pathological liar'?
- Obama bows to another world leader
- Obama: A double-dip recession?
Most Read
- Texas accidentally 'bans' straight-marriage
- Sarah Palin's 'whiny' book
- The media vs. Sarah Palin
- Grading Palin on 'Oprah'
- 2012: President Sarah Palin?
- 9/11 terrorists vs. New Yorkers
- The right to have loud sex
- The last word: Growing up bin Laden
- The last word: Why old dogs are the best dogs
- Sarah Palin's sink or swim interview
- Subscribe
- Give a Gift
- Privacy Policy
- Terms & Conditions
- Ad Info
- THE WEEK UK
- Contact Us
- Subscriber Services
- Jobs
- Site Map/RSS
- Classroom Subscriptions
© 2009 The Week Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. THE WEEK® is a registered trademark owned by Felix Dennis.
THEWEEK.COM is a trademark owned by Felix Dennis.
Show: Oldest | Newest
2 Comments
Posted by obammy, Monday, September 21, 2009, 8:08 pm phak you liberal morons
Posted by Carlos, Saturday, September 26, 2009, 9:57 am Hey idiot The company I used to work for performed indepth, technical security audits on these voting machines. Their vulnerabilities and proven shortcomings, coupled with the fact there is no hardcopy validation of the votes that are cast is just asking for fraud. How anyone thinks these things are a good idea, asis, is beyond me. Anyone who believes not having a way to validate the number of votes cast is stupid beyond belief.
Post a Comment