Why the Clintons just can't quit Clinton Inc.
Scaling back the Clinton Foundation is a good first step. But it's not nearly enough.
After years of complaints about shady dealings with mining magnates and brutal authoritarian petro-states, the Clintons are drastically scaling back the operations of the Clinton Foundation. BuzzFeed News reports that should Hillary Clinton win the election, the foundation will no longer accept money from foreign and corporate donors, and will aggressively downsize its operations. The Clinton Global Initiative will be straight up shuttered.
This is a highly welcome development. Yet it does not fully address the problems with the foundation, nor the largely accurate perception that the Clintons are prone to influence peddling. They ought to fully close the foundation, and take further steps to remove themselves from the sway of the rich global elite.
All this comes in the context of the release of a fresh batch of emails showing wealthy donors to the foundation jostling for access to the Clintons while Hillary was serving as secretary of state. As usual, they do not show any explicit quid-pro-quo, and include many instances of donors being turned down for things they wanted. But they still show Clinton's staff going out of their way to arrange meetings between her and various donors, including the crown prince of Bahrain — a nation that would later get a big increase in U.S. weapons exports.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
There's no smoking gun. But the whole thing is... fishy, and seems to confirm everyone's worst suspicions of the Clintons. This, from The Associated Press, is awfully unsettling.
Maybe this doesn't hold a candle to the time Bill helped a Canadian mining magnate (who has donated $100 million to the Clinton Foundation) obtain a uranium-mining contract in Kazakhstan. Perhaps it doesn't compare to the time a Russian hedge fund that was attempting to buy U.S. uranium mining claims (and whose chairman donated $2.35 million) flew Bill to Moscow to give a speech for $500,000 while Hillary signed off on the purchase as secretary of state. It arguably doesn't even rank with Bill's casual chat with Attorney General Loretta Lynch while the Department of Justice was deciding whether or not to press charges against Hillary for mismanaging her email server. (They ultimately did not, which was almost certainly not the result of a behind-the-scenes conspiracy.) But boy does it look bad.
There are excuses and explanations for nearly every individual incident. But taken together — along with the ultra high-dollar speeches given to various Wall Street players — you get a picture of a couple comfortably ensconced in the supranational world elite, who see basically nothing wrong with serving as powerbrokers between wealthy interests. To that end, the Clinton Foundation is basically an old-fashioned political machine where wealthy people can help support the Clintons — and provide jobs for Clinton loyalists on the side — in return for being able to bend the Clinton ears about their views of the world's problems.
There needn't be an explicit quid-pro-quo agreement for this to create a strong whiff of trading donations for favors.
The Clintons have evinced no sign of understanding how living at the absolute pinnacle of the world elite can warp one's perspective. The most valuable thing presidents possess is their own time and attention, and regularly giving that to people based in large part on how rich they are will inevitably shade one's views in certain ways — especially against the sort of large tax increases on the wealthiest people that will be necessary to pay for a decent paid leave program that Hillary says she wants.
Scaling back the Clinton Foundation — which was largely the result of Chelsea Clinton's efforts — is a worthy first step towards establishing some propriety for a second Clinton administration. But if they really cared to address the perception of influence peddling, they'd shut it down altogether, and speak more frankly about the potential downsides to taking money from, say, Goldman Sachs. But given Hillary's squirrelly answers, the Clintons will likely stop well short of that. For them, things are working out just fine. Why change?
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
'Criminal trail?'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Grindr 'shared user HIV status' with ad firms, lawsuit claims
Speed Read LGBTQ dating app accused of breaching UK data protection laws in case filed at London's High Court
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published
-
The best dog-friendly hotels around the UK
The Week Recommends Take a break with your four-legged friend in accommodation that offers you both a warm welcome
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published