Dear Hillary: Don't soften your image
For the sake of gender equality, you do you
Hillary Clinton is running for president, and I am all in.
I will readily admit this, too: My allegiance has little to do with Clinton's political abilities or policy preferences, and has almost everything to do with the fact that she is a driven, hard-working, enormously successful woman who stands a very good chance of becoming our first female president. It really is long past time for someone to shatter the "highest, hardest glass ceiling" in America.
But here's the rub: For a Clinton campaign (and presidency) to be a true success for gender equality, the longtime politician must remain unapologetically herself. That means embracing all of those supposed negative attributes that make Clinton the driven, hard-working, enormously successful woman that she is. She's ambitious. She's independent. She's bossy. And yes, she's even bitchy. Clinton should own it all, and we ought to respect her for it.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
And yet, here we are, just days into Clinton's presidential run, and the focus is already on the texture of her image. Her first campaign video, which is devoted to a bevy of diverse middle-class families sharing their plans and dreams, is meant to "soften the edges of an image that is more firmly set than that of any other 2016 contender from either party," according to Susan Page at USA Today. A GOP strategist was quick to declare of Clinton: "She does not have that natural ability to commune and connect with people and you can't manufacture that." In that vein, Saturday Night Live's Hillary Clinton is a frightening, power-hungry automaton.
Team Clinton seems to have bought into this, too, hiring Kristina Schake, credited with making Michelle Obama into the much-adored "everywoman" who challenges Jimmy Fallon to a push-up contest. Schake is expected to work such image magic on Clinton as well.
This is nothing new. For Clinton's entire career in the public eye, she has been plagued by demands — from the media, voters, and critics — to dial down what makes her unique and successful. America has long failed to accept Clinton for who she is. We expect her to change — or at least to pretend to.
Clinton was never a typical political wife. She graduated at the top of her class at Yale Law — ahead of Bill — and was the family breadwinner in Arkansas, becoming the first female partner at the state's leading law firm. During her husband's 1980 gubernatorial run, Clinton's maiden name became a target for a Republican opponent. Following Bill's loss, Hillary officially took the Clinton name. Shortly thereafter, ahead of Bill's 1982 gubernatorial campaign, Clinton was given an "Arkansas Makeover" of frosted hair, contact lenses, and stretched vowels.
When the Clintons hit the national stage, she had to work even harder to prove herself a mother and homemaker, in addition to a career woman. During the 1992 campaign, when the Clinton marriage was blasted as more of a political "merger" than a loving relationship, it was the off-putting Hillary, the "hall monitor," who shouldered the blame. Her off-the-cuff remark that she chose to pursue a legal career in Arkansas when she "could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas" as the governor's wife practically derailed her husband's run. Thereafter, Clinton reframed her potential role in the White House as being "a voice for the children" — an inoffensive, first lady-like phrase that fit neatly with past political wives.
Now more than ever, Clinton doesn't need these makeovers. In fact, such image adjustments would do her — and America — an enormous disservice. To soften Clinton's image is to hide the reality of what it takes for women to succeed at the highest levels. You don't become one of the country's top 100 lawyers by being cuddly and nice. You don't become the only first lady in American history to seek political office without being confident. You don't serve as a senator, run for president, serve as secretary of state, and run for president again without being extraordinarily ambitious. We ought to celebrate Clinton for these traits, not ask her to mask them.
This is the "Lean In" era. There are more women in Congress, in the workplace, and in high-ranking positions than ever before. To get there, women have had to throw elbows and be brash, just as men have forever. The path to power is not one that women tend to step daintily through in high heels and an apron. Nor do they ride across it on the wings of a "have it all" unicorn. They pursue their careers with aggression, table their social lives, and have children later in life, if at all.
This is obviously not a path for all women, nor should it be. But those like Clinton who choose it often do so because they are tough and ambitious. They have something to say and demand to be heard. America needs this diversity of voices and ideas. Female role models shouldn't kowtow to dated expectations of how a woman should act or speak. That's not what we expect of our leaders. We want to follow leaders who are steely enough to make the tough decisions, even when they're unpopular. We insist that our leaders be aggressive and direct. We demand that they stand up for what's right and good, even when it's hard.
If, in the face of a berating public and long campaign cycle, Clinton concedes to the pressure by polishing her image and warming her tone, we will make little progress in gender equality — even if she wins. We need female role models who proudly display the attributes required of the hard-won leadership positions they seek. Anything less wouldn't get the job done ��� nor would it inspire like-minded women to choose the arduous path less taken.
And so, Hillary Clinton, for women's progress, you do you.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Lauren Hansen produces The Week’s podcasts and videos and edits the photo blog, Captured. She also manages the production of the magazine's iPad app. A graduate of Kenyon College and Northwestern University, she previously worked at the BBC and Frontline. She knows a thing or two about pretty pictures and cute puppies, both of which she tweets about @mylaurenhansen.
-
Baltimore bridge disaster: Who is going to pay and how?
Today's Big Question Politicians, legal experts, and the insurance industry are all grappling with the financial fallout of America's worst infrastructure tragedy in years
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Melting polar ice is messing with global timekeeping
Speed Read Ice loss caused by climate change is slowing the Earth's rotation
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The Week contest: Stick guitar
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published