Obama in Oslo: A president’s evolving worldview
In his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, President Obama surprised more than a few people with his pragmatic view of military action in response to evil.
Well that was a pleasant surprise, said William Kristol in The Weekly Standard. When President Obama flew to Oslo last week to accept his undeserved Nobel Peace Prize, many of us were braced for more of his reflexive pandering to the pacifist, anti-American Euro-elites. But he started his speech by admitting that his achievements were “slight” compared with previous peace prize winners, and then, to the evident dismay of his European audience, launched into an unapologetic, “hard-headed” defense of the war in Afghanistan and military action in response to evil. “There will be times when nations will find use of force not only necessary but morally justified,” Obama declared. The “ideals” of pacifists like Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. must guide us, Obama said, but as a head of state he cannot be guided by their examples alone. “Evil does exist in the world,” he said. “Negotiations cannot convince al Qaida’s leaders to lay down their arms.”
At times, Obama actually sounded like George Bush, said John Dickerson in Slate.com, which is ironic given that he was awarded the peace prize mainly for not being George Bush. But this speech contained a complexity of thought far beyond Bush’s capabilities. Obama also spoke of “engagement” with rogue regimes as a preferable alternative to war—even if that approach “lacks the satisfying purity of indignation.” More important, he specifically denounced his predecessor’s use of torture and secret prisons, said The New York Times in an editorial. “We lose ourselves when we compromise the very ideals that we fight to defend,” Obama said.
While Obama served up something for both liberals and conservatives, said James Carroll in The Boston Globe, this was no mere exercise in split-the-difference politics. What he was offering here was a candid look at the workings of his own mind, as he balances the ideals of his youth with the realism forced on him by his election. War, he said, is a “human tragedy” and “an expression of human folly.” But the world, he said, has not yet sufficiently evolved to a point at which war can be realistically abandoned. This emerging Obama doctrine is as much theology as it is policy, said George Packer in The New Yorker. Human perfection is not possible, Obama said, but we are obliged nonetheless to work toward it with clear-eyed, even ruthless, pragmatism, accepting whatever progress is possible.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Pardon me if I’m not cheering, said Glenn Greenwald in Salon.com. Obama may have sounded “philosophical, contemplative, and intellectual,�� but the bottom line is that he insisted that the U.S. has the “right” to wage war “unilaterally,” even if we face no attack or imminent threat. My fellow liberals need to come out of denial: Their hero has “put a pretty, intellectual, liberal face on some ugly and decidedly illiberal policies.” Obama’s move to the center was inevitable, said Robert Kagan in The Washington Post. After a year in office, Obama has gained a far broader perspective “about the way the world works,” with North Korea and Iran spitting on his peaceful overtures, China coldly rejecting any talk about human rights, and the global Islamic jihad shaking the foundations of Afghanistan and Pakistan. Obama is evolving into a “hawkish Democrat” in the mold of Harry S. Truman and John F. Kennedy, and in Oslo, he put the world on notice.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Covid four years on: have we got over the pandemic?
Today's Big Question Brits suffering from both lockdown nostalgia and collective trauma that refuses to go away
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Katespiracy: is the media to blame?
Talking Point Public statement about cancer diagnosis followed weeks of wild speculation and conspiracy theories
By Julia O'Driscoll, The Week UK Published
-
'Restoring life to an ancient watershed'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published