Did Bernanke deserve another term?

Was the Senate right to look past the Fed chairman's real estate bubble blunders and reward him with a second term?

Ben Bernanke
(Image credit: (Corbis/EPA/Matthew Cavanaugh))

After heated debate, the Senate on Thursday confirmed Ben Bernanke to a second term as Federal Reserve chairman. Supporters, including President Obama, had warned that rejecting Bernanke would panic investors. But opponents said Bernanke's easy-money policies had fueled the housing bubble, and that his bank bailouts further damaged the economy. The 70-30 vote marked the weakest endorsement ever for a Fed chairman. Did Bernanke deserve a second term? (Watch an AP report about Ben Bernanke's confirmation)

No way. He deserved the boot: The Senate had an opportunity to hold Ben Bernanke accountable for his mistakes, says Simon Johnson in The Huffington Post, which is the real key to stabilizing financial markets. Instead, senators gave Bernanke the green light to concoct "larger bailouts" -- at taxpayer expense -- the next time big banks get themselves in trouble. "What kind of fiscal responsibility strategy is this?"

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us