Did the Justice Department incite the 2012 Trayvon Martin protests?
The conservative group Judicial Watch says it has documents proving active involvement by a DOJ civil mediation unit
As the George Zimmerman trial wraps up in Sanford, Fla., with the jury readying to decide if he murdered 17-year-old Trayvon Martin or shot him in self-defense, the conservative group Judicial Watch is taking us back to the events that led to the trial in the first place.
No, not the shooting death of Martin, as he was walking back to his father's apartment from the 7-Eleven. Rather, the national uproar that led to the arrest of Zimmerman, a month and a half after Martin's death.
Judicial Watch said Wednesday that it "has obtained documents in response to local, state, and federal records requests revealing that a little-known unit of the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Community Relations Service (CRS), was deployed to Sanford, Fla., following the Trayvon Martin shooting to help organize and manage rallies and protests against George Zimmerman."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
That's a pretty explosive charge. "Not only did we have a public statement by the President that might have tainted the jury pool," says Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit, "but now we find the Department of Justice was involved in, basically, organizing a lynch mob?"
Here's what Judicial Watch obtained, among 347 pages of Justice Department documents:
- March 25–27, 2012, CRS spent $674.14 upon being "deployed to Sanford, FL, to work marches, demonstrations, and rallies related to the shooting and death of an African-American teen by a neighborhood watch captain."
- March 25–28, 2012, CRS spent $1,142.84 in Sanford "work marches, demonstrations, and rallies related to the shooting and death of an African-American teen by a neighborhood watch captain."
- March 30–April 1, 2012, CRS spent $892.55 in Sanford "to provide support for protest deployment in Florida."
- March 30–April 1, 2012, CRS spent an additional $751.60 in Sanford "to provide technical assistance to the City of Sanford, event organizers, and law enforcement agencies for the march and rally on March 31."
- April 3–12, 2012, CRS spent $1,307.40 in Sanford "to provide technical assistance, conciliation, and onsite mediation during demonstrations planned in Sanford."
- April 11–12, 2012, CRS spent $552.35 in Sanford "to provide technical assistance for the preparation of possible marches and rallies related to the fatal shooting of a 17 year old African American male."
Along with the $5,320 in expenses racked up by the CRS, Judicial Watch also obtained thousands of pages of emails from Florida officials, including an April 16, 2012, email from Miami-Dade County community officer Amy Carswell congratulating the CRS team "for their outstanding and ongoing efforts to reduce tensions and build bridges of understanding and respect in Sanford, Florida."
Finally, Judicial Watch points to an April 15, 2012, Orlando Sentinel story that alerted the world to the presence of CRS "secretive peacemakers" in Sanford. Here's how the Sentinel's Arelis R. Hernández describes the CRS's activities:
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
The Judicial Watch documents add enough new information to the Sentinel story, says Ed Morrissey at Hot Air, that Congress should at least "look into the DOJ's actions to determine whether they were trying to calm the waters — or trying to bring them to a boil." From these expense reports, it looks like "the CRS was more of a participant and organizer of the protests than a mediator of them."
Is this really "another Obama administration scandal, featuring Eric Holder's DOJ?" asks John Hinderaker at PowerLine. "To me, it doesn't look that way." Sure, it's probable that the CRS "worked hand in glove with the protesters, but there is little reason to doubt that they at least purported to carry out their statutory peacemaking role by working with all parties." The biggest question from this episode, Hinderaker says, is "why are we taxpayers paying for a goofy mediation service within the Department of Justice?"
Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs, and Rush Limbaugh don't see that as the biggest question, says David Weigel at Slate. "On the right, it's becoming conventional wisdom that the Justice Department worked to bring down Zimmerman" for racially motivated reasons, and Judicial Watch's narrative seems to fit the bill.
In fact, says Weigel, it undermines the charge that the Justice Department stirred the embers. The media frenzy started building March 12, and things exploded March 23-24 when students at 34 Miami schools walked out to protest Zimmerman not being arrested. Thanks to Judicial Watch, we now know the CRS didn't step in until March 25. How you see the CRS involvement in the Trayvon Martin ultimately depends on your political views:
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
'Make legal immigration a more plausible option'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
LA-to-Las Vegas high-speed rail line breaks ground
Speed Read The railway will be ready as soon as 2028
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Israel's military intelligence chief resigns
Speed Read Maj. Gen. Aharon Haliva is the first leader to quit for failing to prevent the Hamas attack in October
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published