Bursting the Higher Ed Bubble
David Frum
“Will Higher Education be the Next Bubble to Burst?” So asks a recent op-ed in the Chronicle of Higher Education. The question is powerful. Data points:
• Over the past quarter-century, the average cost of higher education has risen at a rate four times faster than inflation—twice as fast as the cost of health care.
• Tuition, room, and board at private colleges can cost $50,000 per year or more.
• The market crash of 2008 inflicted terrible damage on college endowments. The Commonfund Institute reports that endowments dropped by an average of 23 percent in the five months ending Nov. 30, 2008.
Authors Joseph Cronin and Howard Horton (respectively a past Massachusetts secretary of Education and the president of the New England College of Business and Finance) comment:
“The middle class, which has paid for higher education in the past mainly by taking out loans, may now be precluded from doing so as the private student-loan market has all but dried up. In addition, endowment cushions that allowed colleges to engage in steep tuition discounting are gone. Declines in housing valuations are making it difficult for families to rely on home-equity loans for college financing. Even when the equity is there, parents are reluctant to further leverage themselves into a future where job security is uncertain.
Consumers who have questioned whether it is worth spending $1,000 a square foot for a home are now asking whether it is worth spending $1,000 a week to send their kids to college.”
Even this underestimates the severity of the situation, however. The 2006 Economic Report of the President presents a remarkable fact: Between 2000 and 2005, the average wages of college graduates declined after adjusting for inflation.
From an economic point of view, in other words, a college degree costs more and more and returns less and less. Kind of like a hot stock with a price-to-earnings ratio of 32, it’s a prelude to a crash.
Why are the wages of the college-educated declining? A big part of the answer is that the pool of college graduates is rapidly expanding. It’s not surprising that as college becomes more universal, the return on a college education falls.
As the number of job applicants with degrees rises, employers become more sophisticated in assessing the value of any particular degree. The degree itself matters less than the institution that granted it, the subject areas of concentration, and the grade point average earned. A 4.0 math degree from Cal Tech is a very different thing from a 2.8 communications degree from San Francisco State University.
Now the next question is: Will consumers become more sophisticated too? Tuition, room, and board at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill cost about half what they cost at nearby Duke. Is a Duke education really twice as valuable as one from UNC?
Yet economic benefits are not the sole measurement of value. Intellectually, spiritually, and morally, American higher education is in crisis, with the worst damage manifested at the most expensive institutions. At Duke, racial politics whooped up a faculty lynch mob against student lacrosse players who were falsely accused of rape. It’s often at the costliest universities that students are able to graduate with a degree in English without ever having read Shakespeare, a degree in history despite ignorance of the Civil War, or one in art history without ever having encountered the Renaissance.
In their own ways, universities indulge in some of the worst faults of the corporate sector, overcharging their customers in order to allow managers and staff to engage in wasteful or destructive activities that could never be justified on their own.
With the boom lowering, universities have begun feverishly looking for solutions to their problems. Options include broad admissions of international students, many of whom attend U.S. universities less in hope of obtaining a U.S. degree than of gaining entry to the U.S. labor market.
Over the longer run, however, universities, like other troubled institutions, will have to rethink the fundamentals of their work. Why does it take four years to complete a BA degree? Maybe liberal arts studies make more sense later in life?
But this rethinking should not stop with the universities. The entire American education establishment needs reform.
Maybe tough high school exit exams would serve the needs of employers who currently insist on a BA not for its own sake but as proof that a student was not too lazy or aimless to get one. Indeed, it could be that when the job market attaches less value to a piece of parchment, universities will at last lay aside their often ugly political preoccupations and rediscover their true mission: the pursuit of knowledge as a good in itself.
**Correction: An earlier version of this column said that Hampshire College had joined a financial boycott of Israel. A Hampshire College spokesperson says the school holds investments in funds that include companies that do business in Israel and in at least three Israeli companies: Amdocs, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Check Point Software.




Show: Oldest | Newest
9 Comments
Posted by Tim Letzring, Tuesday, June 2, 2009, 8:51 pm I cannot believe Mr. Frum based this oped on the poor premises of Cronin and Horton. Their concepts are far from norm and hold the elitist perspective of higher education. Of the more than 4200 colleges and universities less than 4 charge the 50000 mentioned. Where have families consider 1000 per square foot for a house The median is a little over 100 per square foot. Poor premises leads to a poor argument and miss the larger picture. There is no question that higher education is transitioning but the numbers here are misleading.
Posted by Jason Smee, Wednesday, June 3, 2009, 2:27 pm I think the author is spot on. A good example is my own education. A 2003 graduate of Washington and Lee a great school, but no Harvard, tuition was 16,950 for 9900 and is 37990 for 0910, a 8.45 annualized increase. CPI Jan 99Jan 09 increased by 2.54, implying a 5.865 real increase. I'm 28, should I have kids at 32, the oldest will attend in 22 years 418. 379901.058622 133,111 / year in real dollars. Now students take 4 less classes, so while paying 77 more in real terms they get 90 less.
Posted by Johnny Reb, Wednesday, June 3, 2009, 4:58 pm 50K a year forcollege, huh? 200K after 4 years. Hm. Let's see... I'm 33 years old, have over 50K in the bank, have zero debt literally, I owe not 1 to anyone, work a recessionproof office job within walking distance of my residence and make over 50K a year. All that and I've never worked one minute of overtime or travelled more than 15 minutes to a job. I'm a high school dropout. Success is garnered through ability not a 200K piece of paper.
Posted by R. Lewis, Wednesday, June 3, 2009, 7:26 pm Like health care, it is the Government writing checks or extending terms that inflate the price of going to school. Neither education nor medicine could sustain their growth without the continued cheap money flowing in from the G. As I finish up my MBA with no real job prospects lined up, I wonder what for. I currently work as a surveillance tech for a casino. Doesn't require a degree at all, and the degrees I have earned have yet to pay off in any way, shape, or form.
Posted by professor jim, Thursday, June 4, 2009, 7:01 pm There is a legend that Euclid was in mid lecture asked by a student what the practical use of all this abstruse learning was. Euclid took a coin from his pocket and told his assistant to go hand that boy a coin, he insists on a monetary profit from his learning.
Posted by Prof. Jerry, Sunday, July 12, 2009, 1:46 pm Prof. Jim does not have a clue. You must earn a living once you finish your education. College is too expensive for his attitude. The real question must be is that BA in Communications worth the total cost paid. In many cases, the answer must be no!
Posted by BigAl, Monday, July 13, 2009, 9:55 am Hey Johnny Reb:Don't forget the 50k you have stashed in your bank account, assuming it isn't in gold, has lost 96 of its value since the inception of the federal reserve.I agree though, one does not need a college degree to make it these days.
Posted by JMiller, Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 12:07 pm Clearly a college education does not ensure the results that it used to. Of course, Obama is now touting the idea of everyone getting a college education. Look at the student dropout rate when parents are paying can you imagine what it would be if the government paid for it? Once schools realize people aren't willing to pay so much, they too will downsize maybe they'll even do away with majors whose graduates invariably wind up in jobs that have nothing to do with what they went to school for.
Post a Comment