Franken: Something funny going on? (AP Photo/Jim Mone)
Recounting Al Franken's votes
There's something funny going on in Minnesota, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. Comedian Al Franken is mysteriously gaining ground in his too-close-to-call race against Republican Sen. Norm Coleman. Lost ballots are suddenly turning up, "in some cases under strange circumstances," and it seems like the Democrats are trying to add "to their jackpot by stealing a Senate seat" for this left-wing joker.
One thing is particularly troubling as a recount looms, said Katherine Kerstein in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Star-Tribune, and the trickle of votes moves "inexorably in Franken's direction." Fairness requires that the recount be conducted in a "nonpartisan fashion," yet Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie came to office with the help of Democratic activists, who launched a nationwide effort to put Democrats into jobs like his so they "could wield influence in precisely the sort of hair's breadth race we have here."
"If you think all of this is starting to sound a bit like Florida in 2000," said Steve Benen in The Washington Monthly online, "we're on the same page." The Republicans are attacking the official in charge, Ritchie, and accusing him of associating with ACORN and "(cue the scary music)" MoveOn.org so they can either influence the outcome or, if that fails, discredit the process in advance.
Franken will come out on top, either way, said Scott Rafferty in AlterNet, and not from cheating. Hand counting of improperly marked ballots—more common in low-education, low-income areas that trend Democratic—should be more than enough for Franken to close the 200-vote gap. And "Minnesota only uses paper ballots, no punch cards and no touch screen," so there will be a paper trail that should put the claims of fraud to rest.
Comment on this article
Recent comments | 29 total
Why should the Reps. care - they stole the last 2 elections.
It's something they're good at, if 2000 is a clue.
I think it's time for the US to have international observers since their elections effect the world.
Wow, suddenly the WSJ thinks having partisan officials oversee elections isn't such a good idea!
Nice to see the Dems might be finally learning some of the Republicans' nasty tricks. :) It's about time Dems played politics as immorally as Repubs do.
digg del.icio.us stumbleUpon newsvine reddit furl