Pilots, laptops, and air safety
Were the Northwest pilots who overshot Minneapolis browsing their PCs or sleeping? Which would be worse?
A Northwest Airlines airplane taxis down a runway at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.
(EPA/Corbis/Craig Lassig)
Two Northwest Airlines pilots who overshot their destination, Minneapolis, by 150 miles said they weren't napping, but reviewing new company policies on their laptop computers. Either way, they were violating airline safety policy. Should passengers be concerned that pilot boredom and distractions are making the skies less safe? (Watch a CBS report on the pilots' cyberspace distraction)
Autopilot can make pilots dangerously complacent: It's good news that the pilots of Northwest Airlines Flight 188 weren’t asleep, says Scott McCartney in The Wall Street Journal. The bad news is they “just plain weren’t paying a lick of attention to flying the airplane” as they worked on their laptops. Autopilot has made flying a “boring” but safer task. If we’re not careful, though, pilot complacency will make it more dangerous again.
"NWA Flight 188: Pilots say distraction, laptops led to over-flight"
It could have been worse: Good thing the airliner wasn’t equipped with in-flight Wi-Fi, says Ross Miller in Engadget. It’s bad enough that the pilots were intensely studying airline crew scheduling software—imagine “how far off they’d have been if the pilots had access to World of Warcraft.”
"Pilots too busy with laptops to remember flight path"
Distractions weren't the problem here: It's simply "impossible to believe" that these pilots got lost in their laptops, says James Fallows in The Atlantic. It's also far more damning than the “story they’re resisting—that they simply fell asleep.” Blaming the overshoot on “intense laptop use” would be like surgeons saying they were so engrossed in a football game that they sliced open a patient but forgot to remove his appendix—in other words, “beyond the pale.”
"More on the Minneapolis overflight"
Wrong. Automated cockpits make boredom a threat: Pilot fatigue “is certainly an increasing concern,” says Clive Irving in The Daily Beast. But so is the newer problem of the “undemanding workload of highly automated cockpits.” The Northwest pilots admitted to the “euphemism of losing ‘situational awareness’”—perhaps another way of saying they were “bored out of their minds.” Is it so hard to believe that they’d turn to laptops to kill time?
"The new cockpit threat"




Show: Oldest | Newest
4 Comments
Posted by Mike Licht, Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 11:18 am Work scheduling software? Yeah, sure.See:notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/distractedflying/
Posted by Mehitabel, Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 1:45 pm Regardless of what they were doing, there's a twoman concept at play here. There's no way both should have had their headsets off at the same time. Just thank heaven there wasn't ANOTHER emergency that they couldn't have received warning about. Face it, if that had happened on 9/11, they'd be picking AIM7 pieces out of their hair while asking St Peter WTH just happened?!
Posted by Nigel Collins, Wednesday, October 28, 2009, 7:25 am Give me a break. These two fell asleep, and when the stuff hit the fan, they decided that the laptop story was better than the truth or any other alternative.
Posted by PPLS, Saturday, October 31, 2009, 1:45 am Having been a part of a crew, I agree they should be required to repass all ground and flight requirements to get their seats back. If what they did was all right, then why not go to sleep after take off and wake up when the plane dumps you out of the bunk just before landing. We have that technology, but it is just a machine that will fail eventually. That is why one of the crew has to pay attention to the aircraft. This plane could have been shot down by our own military jets. That serious enough for you!!!!!
Post a Comment